There’s a lot of debate about Investigation Vs Research – Are similar because both aim to gain knowledge.
However, it has been discovered that Investigation Vs Research have been technically distinct in recent years.
Research is mainly used to uncover, interpret, and revise human knowledge in many parts. It is founded on human action, intellectual examination.
Research is the process of discovering a new invention. Or a method and can be defined as the search for new knowledge. The research online plagiarism checker entails obtaining data and materials through fieldwork and operations currently underway.
On the other hand, investigation is the process of gathering knowledge through interrogating a subject by follow-up, research, or a structured procedure of discovery. The act or process of investigating entails a thorough search or examination to uncover information in an organized and thorough manner.
An investigation is described as a search for fixed and definite facts in the expectation of obtaining helpful evidence or information to determine and support the argument and principle.
-
Investigation Vs Research
One of the most popular ways to distinguish between research and investigation is as a dichotomy – two separate and mutually exclusive categories.
Research is perceived as being more concerned with developing generalizable information and being more theoretical and under the direction of the researchers.
Investigations are perceived as being more concerned with specialized, applicable knowledge and being more controlled by those who pay or commission them.
Research
- The goal is to put theory to the test and develop generalizable results.
- Scholars in a discipline ask the questions.
- In a discipline, peer review is used to assess quality and significance.
- Contribution to knowledge is the ultimate test of worth.
Investigation
- The goal is to see how effective a particular programme or model is.
- Key stakeholders and primary intended users of investigation findings are the source of questions.
- Those who will utilize the findings to take action and make judgments rate the quality and importance.
- Usefulness in improving effectiveness is the ultimate test of worth.
-
Investigation and research as separate entities
A Investigation Vs Research – distinct perspective on study and investigation considers them two unrelated factors that aren’t mutually exclusive. A task can consist of both research and investigation, or none. It’s all about being empirical in research. Drawing evaluative findings of quality, merit, or worth is the goal of investigation.
Census data, for example, or interview data that collects descriptions. Examples of non-investigative research that involves factual descriptions without quality judgments.
Making evaluative judgments without systematic data collection — for example, a connoisseur evaluator who makes a judgement without meticulously acquiring data – is an example of non-research investigation.
When they overlap, the evaluative judgments have been based on careful data gathering and analysis.
-
“Investigation” refers to a subset of research.
Basic research and applied research that does not provide evaluative conclusions are examples of non-investigative research.
Defining the investigation’s aim and scope, formalizing decision-making processes, deciding who will perform what responsibilities, acquiring and analyzing data, reporting, and supporting use are just a few of the activities involved in an investigation.
-
Research as a subset of investigation
According to this viewpoint, one of the duties involved in conducting an investigation is acquiring empirical evidence.
Clarifying or negotiating the principal intended users and their primary intended uses, selecting key inquiry questions, clarifying or negotiating resources to answer the questions, and enabling the application of findings are some of the other activities for example renewable energy is research in science.
How to frame an investigation and research?
Framing an investigation
When an employee lodges an informal or formal complaint, the employer should act quickly to resolve the alleged conflict, safeguard all individuals involved, and commence an inquiry.
As inconvenient as investigations can be, they must be conducted quickly, thoroughly, and effectively to ensure everyone’s safety. Therefore, the following procedures should be taken as soon as the employer gets a verbal or written complaint.
Step 1: Make certain that your information is kept private
Employee claims must be kept confidential to the best of the employer’s abilities. As a result, keeping all information acquired in the initial complaint, such as interviews and records, totally discreet may not be practicable.
Step 2: Provide Temporary Security
One of the first things to examine would be taking immediate steps to protect the accuser or alleged victim. To avoid further harassment or retaliation, separating the putative victim from the offender may be important.
Step 3: Make an investigation strategy
To be effective and well-executed, an investigation must be well-planned. Therefore, a comprehensive strategy should contain an overview of the problem, the creation of a witness list, and information and evidence sources.
Step 4: Make a list of questions to ask during the interview
Questions should be established during the planning stage, but more questions will be added throughout the investigation as new evidence and information are given.
Step 5: Conduct Interviews
Interviews can be done after the proper investigator has been chosen, an investigation strategy has been developed, and interview questions have been created.
Framing research
A framework will guide your research, and the framing document you create can also serve as a concept note to advisors and partners, as well as a funding request to potential funders.
Step 1: Set your research goals
It’s critical to define your research goals to build a solid basis for your research.
Step 2: Make a list of the questions
Limit your research topics to a narrow time range and frame them with essential questions that only your study can solve.
Consider the following:
- What exactly are you interested in learning more about, and what hypothesis would you like to test? It will help you think through this if you write it down.
- Is there any study on this topic? If there is already research, it may not be necessary to do a new study unless the existing research is insufficiently extensive or specific.
- In your analysis, what time do you wish to focus on? Will your research, for example, focus solely on the previous year or several previous years, such as the previous five?
- Do you intend to repeat your survey in the future to collect data?
Step 3: Prepare a list of the types of data you need to collect and analyze your questions
Now that you’ve figured out your essential questions, you can figure out what kind of data will assist you in answering them. This will allow you to plan the remainder of your research timetable.
Step 4: Define the end products of your research
Making an early strategy of what items you’ll make will assist you to figure out what resources you’ll need, in addition to allowing you to set your time frame.
Will you, for example, merely generate a lengthy study report, or will you also develop info-graphics, brochures, and presentations? In addition, you may need to employ a design firm, plan events, and so on, depending on your items.
